Post by josh on Nov 15, 2011 19:51:58 GMT -7
So, this has been going around in my head for a number of years now. Doesn't it seem a little paradoxical for those of us who are adamantly opposed to our various wars (declared and undeclared, public and secret) to continue to financially support the government that is fueling them? It seems ridiculous to me that we would protest the war and then continue to support it with our tax dollars.
A few years ago, H.D. Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay his poll tax in protest of the Mexican-American War. He was willing to be a true conscientious objector to what he saw as an unjust war. Are we? It would appear not, so far as I can tell.
My question for everyone is, at what point do we figure out that the true power of the purse resides with us, the tax-payers? At what point do we simply refuse to go along with the sick schemes of our war-mongering power elites? At what point do we stand up and say "not with my money you don't!"?
The way things look to me now, those in the seats of power in Washington will continue to do whatever they please, knowing full well that no matter what percentage of the population disagrees with their policies, pretty much everyone will keep on sending in their pound of flesh. I think that it is high time we started talking seriously about tax-protesting as a vote of no-confidence in our corrupted system. What good does being morally opposed to the wars do if we are forced to continue our financial support? Let's face it, we've all been intimidated by the IRS, or this proposal of mine wouldn't sound all that radical.
Of course, nowadays our income tax money isn't really going to fund the wars; we're borrowing all that money. My understanding is that ALL of the income tax is taken up just paying the interest on the Federal debt. Still, I think that if we really want to show that we mean business, we have to hit "them" where it hurts: in the pocketbook. They've been doing it to us for the better part of a century.
A few years ago, H.D. Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay his poll tax in protest of the Mexican-American War. He was willing to be a true conscientious objector to what he saw as an unjust war. Are we? It would appear not, so far as I can tell.
My question for everyone is, at what point do we figure out that the true power of the purse resides with us, the tax-payers? At what point do we simply refuse to go along with the sick schemes of our war-mongering power elites? At what point do we stand up and say "not with my money you don't!"?
The way things look to me now, those in the seats of power in Washington will continue to do whatever they please, knowing full well that no matter what percentage of the population disagrees with their policies, pretty much everyone will keep on sending in their pound of flesh. I think that it is high time we started talking seriously about tax-protesting as a vote of no-confidence in our corrupted system. What good does being morally opposed to the wars do if we are forced to continue our financial support? Let's face it, we've all been intimidated by the IRS, or this proposal of mine wouldn't sound all that radical.
Of course, nowadays our income tax money isn't really going to fund the wars; we're borrowing all that money. My understanding is that ALL of the income tax is taken up just paying the interest on the Federal debt. Still, I think that if we really want to show that we mean business, we have to hit "them" where it hurts: in the pocketbook. They've been doing it to us for the better part of a century.